Pip: A Nasi has been playing a game that spent four years in development limbo — long enough that the reviewer genuinely forgot it existed.
Mara: That's the territory today: a full review of Pragmata, the Capcom sci-fi action title, covering story, graphics, sound, combat, and where the four-year wait actually lands.
Pip: Let's get into the review.
41. Pragmata — Worth the Four-Year Wait?
Mara: The central question the review opens with is simple: did Pragmata justify its delay? The post sets the scene — first announced in 2022, delayed through 2023, quietly forgotten until release.
Pip: And the verdict, stated right at the top, is: "4년의 기다림. 신선하고 즐거운 체험" — "Four years of waiting. A fresh and enjoyable experience."
Mara: That framing holds through the whole review. The story is described as short but structurally tight — a Master Chief-looking protagonist crashes on the moon, meets an AI named Diana, and carries a small child through the whole thing. The review notes that the mid-narrative beats between the protagonist and Diana build genuine emotional investment.
Pip: A space marine hauling a kid around the moon is not the power fantasy the box art implies, but apparently that's exactly the point.
Mara: Right — the review specifically says the protagonist feels more like a dad than a combat soldier, and that works in the game's favor tonally. On graphics, the closed lunar environment actually helps: no open-world draw distance to tax the hardware, so frame rate stays solid during combat. Occasional cutscene dips are flagged, possibly a capture card issue rather than the PS5 itself.
Mara: Sound gets the highest marks. The review calls out full Korean voice dubbing — rare enough to warrant a five-star rating on its own — and notes the Korean track beats both Japanese and English because the main director is Korean.
Pip: Combat takes the most unpacking. Early on it reads like a cover shooter, but past chapter three the game flips: hacking becomes the primary tool, guns drop to support role. The review puts it plainly — if you treat guns as the main weapon, the game is hard; treat hacking as the main weapon, it opens up.
Mara: The review's one persistent frustration is auto-targeting that frequently locks onto the wrong enemy. A lock-on system, it says, would have made combat noticeably more enjoyable. Convenience elsewhere is high — puzzles are soft, navigation is clear — except for tracking collectible Kevin robots, which offer no map indicator at all.
Pip: The final score lands at 4.8 out of 5. The summary line is "짧지만 즐겁게. 매력적인 스토리" — short but enjoyable, with a compelling story. The one genuine caveat is volume: ten to fifteen hours feels lean for a four-year delay, and the review suspects repeated identity shifts — survival game, horror game, hacking game — drove that timeline.
Mara: A game that nearly vanished into development silence, reviewed in full with a score that says the wait was worth it — mostly.
Pip: More from Manasi next time.
답글 남기기